Comparison of Lung-RADS Version 1.1 and Lung-RADS Version 2022 in Classifying Airway Nodules Detected at Lung Cancer Screening CT.

Purpose To compare the Lung Imaging Reporting and Data System (Lung-RADS) version 1.1 with version 2022 classification of airway nodules detected at lung cancer screening CT examinations. Materials and Methods This retrospective study included all patients who underwent a lung cancer screening CT examination in the authors' health care network between 2015 and 2021 with a reported airway or endobronchial nodule. A fellowship-trained cardiothoracic radiologist reviewed these CT images and characterized the airway nodules by size, location, multiplicity, morphology, dependent portions of airway, internal air, fluid attenuation, distal changes, outcome at follow-up, and final pathologic diagnosis, if malignant. Sensitivity and specificity of Lung-RADS version 1.1 in detecting malignant nodules were compared with those of Lung-RADS version 2022 using the McNemar test. Results A total of 174 patients were included. Of these, 163 (94%) had airway nodules that were deemed benign, while 11 (6%) had malignant nodules. Airway nodules in the trachea and mainstem bronchi were all benign, while lobar and segmental airway nodules had the highest risk for lung cancer (17.2% and 11.1%, respectively). Of the 12 subsegmental airway nodules that were obstructive, three (25%) were malignant and nine (75%) were benign. Nodules with nonobstructive morphologies, dependent portions of airway, internal air, or fluid attenuation were all benign. Only 10 of the 92 (10.9%) patients with positive Lung-RADS by clinical report had cancer. Lung-RADS version 2022 resulted in higher specificity than version 1.1 (82% vs 50%, P < .001), without sacrificing sensitivity (91% for both). Conclusion Compared with the previous version, Lung-RADS version 2022 reduced the number of false-positive screening CT examinations while still identifying malignant airway nodules. Keywords: CT, Lung, Primary Neoplasms, Pulmonary, Lung Cancer Screening, Lung-RADS, Nodule Risk, Airway Nodule, Endobronchial Nodule © RSNA, 2024.

Quantifying and Reducing Errors in Vascular Imaging Examination Orders Through a Multistage Quality Improvement Intervention.

PURPOSE: The aims of this study were to quantify order error rates for vascular imaging examinations and to assess the effects of a multistage quality improvement intervention on those rates. METHODS: In this prospective, institutional review board-exempt project at a large academic quaternary care hospital, the authors aimed to quantify and reduce the order error rate by 50%. The authors analyzed 844 orders for all vascular imaging examinations placed before the intervention (July 19 to August 1, 2021, and September 13 to September 26, 2021), after an intervention in the cardiac surgery department consisting of a new customized order option in the electronic health record for routine preoperative patients (postintervention 1, February 28 to March 27, 2022); and after an educational and feedback campaign (postintervention 2, May 23 to June 5, 2022). Incorrect orders were identified by a radiology trainee during protocoling if the reasons for ordered examination and imaging examination were discordant and subsequently confirmed with the ordering provider. The primary outcome, order error rate, was compared across the project periods using the χ2 test and by ordering department using the χ2 and Fisher exact tests. RESULTS: The preintervention order error rate of 16% (50 of 306) decreased by 83% to 3% (10 of 353) at postintervention 1 (P < .001) and was durable at 3% (6 of 185) by project end. Chest CT with or without contrast constituted the majority of incorrect orders (44%, 22 of 50); "Pre-Op" was the most common examination reason (32% [16 of 50]). Cardiac surgery orderers were responsible for the most incorrect orders (32% [16 of 50]). All four most common ordering departments, including cardiac surgery, reduced their order error rates after the intervention (P < .001). CONCLUSIONS: Incorrect orders for imaging examinations can be reduced through targeted quality improvement interventions combining tailored electronic health record order options with education and feedback on practice habits.

Anatomy of the lung revisited by 3D-CT imaging.

The anatomy of the lung was originally described based on data acquired from cadaveric studies and surgical findings. Over time, computed tomography (CT) and three-dimensional (3D) imaging techniques have been developed, allowing for reconstruction and understanding of lung anatomy in a more intuitive way. The wide adoption of 3D-CT imaging technology has led to a variety of anatomical studies performed not only by anatomists but also by surgeons and radiologists. Such studies have led to new or modified classification systems, shed light on lung anatomy from a useful surgical viewpoint, and enabled us to analyze lung anatomy with a focus on particular anatomical features. 3D images also allow for enhanced pre- and intra-operative simulation, improved surgical safety, enhanced educational utility, and the capacity to perform large-scale anatomical studies in shorter time frames. We will review here the key features of 3D-CT imaging of the lung, along with representative anatomical studies regarding (I) general lung anatomy, (II) anatomy of the right and left lobes, and (III) features of interlobar vessels. The current surge of 3D imaging analysis shows that the field is growing, with the technology continuing to improve. Future studies using these new and innovative methodologies will continue to refine our understanding of lung anatomy while enhancing our ability to perform safe and effective surgical resections.

Impact of an Automated Closed-Loop Communication and Tracking Tool on the Rate of Recommendations for Additional Imaging in Thoracic Radiology Reports.

OBJECTIVE: Assess the effects of feedback reports and implementing a closed-loop communication system on rates of recommendations for additional imaging (RAIs) in thoracic radiology reports. METHODS: In this retrospective, institutional review board-approved study at an academic quaternary care hospital, we analyzed 176,498 thoracic radiology reports during a pre-intervention (baseline) period from April 1, 2018, to November 30, 2018; a feedback report only period from December 1, 2018, to September 30, 2019; and a closed-loop communication system plus feedback report (IT intervention) period from October 1, 2019, to December 31, 2020, promoting explicit documentation of rationale, time frame, and imaging modality for RAI, defined as complete RAI. A previously validated natural language processing tool was used to classify reports with an RAI. Primary outcome of rate of RAI was compared using a control chart. Multivariable logistic regression determined factors associated with likelihood of RAI. We also estimated the completeness of RAI in reports comparing IT intervention to baseline using χ2 statistic. RESULTS: The natural language processing tool classified 3.2% (5,682 of 176,498) reports as having an RAI; 3.5% (1,783 of 51,323) during the pre-intervention period, 3.8% (2,147 of 56,722) during the feedback report only period (odds ratio: 1.1, P = .03), and 2.6% (1,752 of 68,453) during the IT intervention period (odds ratio: 0.60, P < .001). In subanalysis, the proportion of incomplete RAI decreased from 84.0% (79 of 94) during the pre-intervention period to 48.5% (47 of 97) during the IT intervention period (P < .001). DISCUSSION: Feedback reports alone increased RAI rates, and an IT intervention promoting documentation of complete RAI in addition to feedback reports led to significant reductions in RAI rate, incomplete RAI, and improved overall completeness of the radiology recommendations.

Think Like an MBA: Development, Implementation, and Evaluation of an Academic Radiology Business Series (ARBS) for Radiology Trainees.

RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES: To address existing educational gaps in the business of radiology and medicine, we developed, implemented, and evaluated an Academic Radiology Business Series (ARBS) as part of a longitudinal noninterpretive skills curriculum in our radiology residency program. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Mixed lecture- and discussion-based sessions were prepared and taught by content experts and radiologist-leaders at our institution in the style of a typical MBA curriculum, drawing on five core pillars: strategy, management, operations, finance, and health policy and economics. The series concluded with an interactive discussion of a Harvard Business School case study. To study the effectiveness of the curriculum, Wilcoxon rank-sum test was used to compare survey results before and after the curriculum. RESULTS: Nearly 80% of the pre-curriculum survey respondents were not satisfied with the current training offered in the business of medicine. Although 94% of trainees were interested in pursuing leadership positions in healthcare, they have self-reported knowledge gaps in the fundamentals of the business of medicine. There were significant improvements in satisfaction with their training in the business of medicine and perceived improvements in knowledge of important concepts in the business of medicine after participating in the curriculum (p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Radiology trainees have strong interest in the business of radiology and appreciate its importance yet feel inadequately prepared during training. Intentional training incorporated into residency education in the form of an innovative educational initiative that brings radiology trainees together and utilizes an institution's own leaders to teach is feasible and effective.

Beyond business as usual: Radiology residency educational response to the COVID-2019 pandemic.

The COVID-19 pandemic has disrupted standard hospital operations and diagnostic radiology resident education at academic medical centers across the country. Deferment of elective surgeries and procedures coupled with a shift of resources toward increased inpatient clinical needs for the care of COVID-19 patients has resulted in substantially decreased imaging examinations at many institutions. Additionally, both infection control and risk mitigation measures have resulted in minimal on-site staffing of both trainees and staff radiologists at many institutions. As a result, residents have been placed in nonstandard learning environments, including working from home, engaging in a virtual curriculum, and participating in training sessions in preparation for potential reassignment to other patient care settings. Typically, for residents to gain the necessary knowledge, skills, and experience to practice independently upon graduation, radiology training programs must provide an optimal balance between resident education and clinical obligations. We describe our experience adapting to the challenges in educational interruptions and clinical work reassignments of 41 interventional and diagnostic radiology residents at a large academic center. We highlight opportunities for collaboration and teamwork in creatively adjusting and planning for the short and long-term impact of the pandemic on resident education. This experience shows how the residency educational paradigm was shifted during a pandemic and can serve as a template to address future disruptions.

Quantifying Impact of Disruption to Radiology Education During the COVID-19 Pandemic and Implications for Future Training.

PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to assess the impact on radiology resident education due to the COVID-19 pandemic in order to inform future educational planning. METHODS: During a 10-week study period from March 16 to May 22, 2020, changes to educational block-weeks (BW) of first through fourth year residents (R1-4) were documented as disrupted in the setting of the COVID-19 pandemic. The first 5 weeks and the second 5 weeks were evaluated separately for temporal differences. Overall and mean disrupted BW per resident were documented. Wilcoxon rank-sum tests were used to assess pairwise differences between classes with Bonferroni-adjusted P-values, as well as differences in the early versus later phase of the pandemic. RESULTS: Of 373 BW, 56.6% were assigned to virtual curriculum, 39.4% radiology clinical duties, 2.9% illness, and 1.1% reassignment. Scheduling intervention affected 6.2 ± 2.3 (range 1-10) mean BW per resident over the 10-week study period. The R3 class experienced the largest disruption, greater than the R2 classes, and statistically significantly more than the R1 and R4 classes (both P < 0.05). The second half of the pandemic caused statistically significantly more schedule disruptions than the first half (P = 0.009). DISCUSSION: The impact of COVID-19 pandemic varied by residency class year, with the largest disruption of the R3 class and the least disruption of the R4 class. To optimize future educational opportunities, shifting to a competency-based education paradigm may help to achieve proficiency without extending the length of the training program.

Cross-Residency Radiologic/Pathologic Correlation Curriculum: Teaching Correlation of Surgical Specimens With Imaging.

The College of American Pathologists expects pathologists to attain competency in radiologic/pathologic correlation, including correlation of histopathologic findings with imaging findings. While pathology residents appreciate the importance of radiologic/pathologic correlation, their lack of experience and confidence in interpreting imaging studies deters them from obtaining specimen radiographs and reviewing preoperative imaging studies. Formal training in this domain is lacking. A cross-residency curriculum was developed to help pathology residents build basic skills in the correlation of surgical specimens with preoperative imaging and specimen radiographs. Didactic sessions were prepared by 3 pairs of radiology and pathology residents with guidance from radiology and pathology attendings in the subspecialty areas of breast, musculoskeletal, and head and neck. The authors describe the development, implementation, and assessment of the curriculum. A total of 20 pathology residents attended the sessions, with 7 completing both the pre- and postintervention surveys. These residents gained confidence in their ability to interpret specimen radiographs and to select specimens to evaluate with radiography. They gained an appreciation of the importance of collaboration with radiologists in evaluating specimens and of viewing preoperative imaging studies to guide gross examination and dissection. They reported obtaining specimen radiographs and viewing preoperative imaging studies more frequently after attending the sessions. Innovative solutions such as this cross-residency educational initiative offer a potential solution to fulfill the radiologic/pathologic correlation competency standard for pathology residents and may be replicable by other residency programs and academic institutions.

Radiology Trainee vs Faculty Radiologist Fluoroscopy Time for Imaging-Guided Procedures: A Retrospective Study of 17,966 Reports Over a 5.5-Year Period.

To evaluate differences in fluoroscopy time (FT) for common vascular access and gastrointestinal procedures performed by radiology trainees vs faculty radiologists. Report information was extracted for all 17,966 index fluoroscopy services performed by trainees or faculty, or both from 2 university hospitals over 66 months. Various vascular access procedures (eg, peripherally inserted central catheters [PICCs] and ports) and gastrointestinal fluoroscopy procedures (eg, upper gastrointestinal and contrast enema studies) were specifically targeted. Statistical analysis was performed. FT was recorded in 17,549 of 17,966 reports (98%) The 1393 procedures performed by nonphysician providers or transitional year interns were excluded. Residents, fellows, and faculty were primary operators in 5066, 6489, and 4601 procedures, respectively. Average FT (in seconds) for resident and fellow services, respectively, was less than that of faculty only for PICCs (75 and 101 vs 148, P < 0.01). For all other procedures, average FT of trainee services was greater than that for faculty. This was statistically significant (P < 0.05) for fellows vs faculty port placement (121 vs 87), resident vs faculty small bowel series (130 vs 96), and both resident and fellow vs faculty esophagram procedures (143 and 183 vs 126 ). FT for residents was significantly less than that for fellows only for PICCs (75 vs 101, P < 0.01). For most, but not all, fluoroscopy procedures commonly performed by radiology trainees, FT is greater than that for procedures performed by faculty radiologists. Better awareness and understanding of such differences may aid training programs in developing benchmarks, protocols, and focused teaching in the safe use of fluoroscopy for patients and operators.

Trainees May Add Value to Patient Care by Decreasing Addendum Utilization in Radiology Reports.

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the impact of trainee involvement and other factors on addendum rates in radiology reports. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This retrospective study was performed in a tertiary care pediatric hospital. From the institutional radiology data repository, we extracted all radiology reports from January 1 to June 30, 2016, as well as trainee (resident or fellow) involvement, imaging modality, patient setting (emergency, inpatient, or outpatient), order status (routine vs immediate), time of interpretation (regular work hours vs off-hours), radiologist's years of experience, and sex. We grouped imaging modalities as advanced (CT, MRI, and PET) or nonadvanced (any modality that was not CT, MRI, or PET) and radiologist experience level as ≤ 20 years or > 20 years. Our outcome measure was the rate of addenda in radiology reports. Statistical analysis was performed using multivariate logistic regression. RESULTS: From 129,033 reports finalized during the study period, 418 (0.3%) had addenda. Reports generated without trainees were 12 times more likely than reports with trainee involvement to have addenda (odds ratio [OR] = 12.2, p < 0.001). Advanced imaging studies were more likely than nonadvanced studies to be associated with addendum use (OR = 4.7, p < 0.001). Reports generated for patients in emergency or outpatient settings had a slightly higher likelihood of addendum use than those in an inpatient setting (OR = 1.5, p = 0.04; and OR = 1.3, p = 0.04, respectively). Routine orders had a slightly higher likelihood of addendum use compared with immediate orders (OR = 1.3, p = 0.01). We found no difference in addendum use by radiologist's sex, radiologist's years of experience, emergency versus outpatient setting, or time of interpretation. CONCLUSION: Trainees may add value to patient care by decreasing addendum rates in radiology reports.

Encouraging Student Interest in Teaching Through a Medical Student Teaching Competition.

PROBLEM: Clinician educators have realized the value not only of assigning teaching roles to medical students but also of offering explicit training in how to teach effectively. Despite this interest in the development of medical students' teaching skills, formal teaching instruction and opportunities for practice are lacking. APPROACH: To encourage medical student interest in teaching, the authors developed and implemented a medical student teaching competition (MSTC) at Emory University School of Medicine during the summers of 2014, 2015, and 2016. Each year, eight student finalists were each paired with a physician "teaching coach" and given one month to prepare for the MSTC. During the competition, each finalist delivered an eight-minute presentation to a panel of seven physician and resident judges. The authors describe the development, implementation, and assessment of the MSTC. OUTCOMES: Approximately 150 medical students and faculty members attended the MSTC each year. The students in attendance felt that the MSTC made them more likely to seek out opportunities to learn how to teach effectively and to practice teaching. Additionally, some students are now more interested in learning about a career in academic medicine than they were before the MSTC. NEXT STEPS: Given the need for more formal initiatives dedicated to improving the teaching skills of doctors-in-training, including medical students, innovative solutions such as the MSTC may enhance a medical school's existing curriculum and encourage student interest in teaching. The MSTC model may be generalizable to other medical schools.

Impact of Patient Photographs on Radiologists' Visual Search of Chest Radiographs.

RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES: To increase detection of mislabeled medical imaging studies, evidence shows it may be useful to include patient photographs during interpretation. This study examined how inclusion of photographs impacts visual search. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Ten radiologists participated. Average age was 43.00 years and average years Board-certified was 9.70, with 2 residents, 1 general, 2 abdominal, 4 cardiothoracic, and 1 pediatric radiologist. They viewed 21 portable chest radiographs with and without a simultaneously acquired photograph of the patient while visual search was recorded. Their task was to note placement of lines and tubes. RESULTS: Presence of the photograph reduced the number of fixations (chest radiograph only mean 98.68; chest with photograph present 80.81; photograph 10.59; p < 0.0001) and total dwell (chest radiograph only mean 30.84 seconds; chest radiograph with photograph present 25.68; photograph 3.93; p < 0.0001) on the chest radiograph as a result of periodically looking at the photograph. Overall viewing time did not increase with addition of the photograph because time not spent on the radiograph was spent on the photograph. On average, readers scanned from the radiograph to the photographs about four times during search. Men and non-cardiothoracic radiologists spent significantly more time scanning all the images, including the photographs. Average preference for having photographs was 6.10 on a 0-10 scale, and neck and chest were preferred as areas to include in the photograph. CONCLUSION: Photographs may help with certain image interpretation tasks and may help personalize the reading experience for radiologists without increasing interpretation time.

Prevalence of Cholesterol Treatment Eligibility and Medication Use Among Adults--United States, 2005-2012.

A high blood level of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) remains a major risk factor for atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD), although data from 2005 through 2012 has shown a decline in high cholesterol (total and LDL cholesterol) along with an increase in the use of cholesterol-lowering medications. The most recent national guidelines (published in 2013) from the American College of Cardiology and the American Heart Association (ACC/AHA) expand previous recommendations for reducing cholesterol to include lifestyle modifications and medication use as part of complete cholesterol management and to lower risk for ASCVD. Because changes in cholesterol treatment guidelines might magnify existing disparities in care and medication use, it is important to describe persons currently eligible for treatment and medication use, particularly as more providers implement the 2013 ACC/AHA guidelines. To understand baseline estimates of U.S. adults on or eligible for cholesterol treatment, as well as to identify sex and racial/ethnic disparities, CDC analyzed data from the 2005-2012 National Health and Nutrition Examination Surveys (NHANES). Because the 2013 ACC/AHA guidelines focus on initiation or continuation of cholesterol treatment, adults meeting the guidelines' eligibility criteria as well as adults who were currently taking cholesterol-lowering medication were assessed as a group. Overall, 36.7% of U.S. adults or 78.1 million persons aged ≥21 years were on or eligible for cholesterol treatment. Within this group, 55.5% were currently taking cholesterol-lowering medication, and 46.6% reported making lifestyle modifications, such as exercising, dietary changes, or controlling their weight, to lower cholesterol; 37.1% reported making lifestyle modifications and taking medication, and 35.5% reported doing neither. Among adults on or eligible for cholesterol-lowering medication, the proportion taking cholesterol-lowering medication was higher for women than men and for non-Hispanic whites (whites) than Mexican-Americans and non-Hispanic blacks (blacks). Further efforts by clinicians and public health practitioners are needed to implement complementary and targeted patient education and disease management programs to reduce sex and racial/ethnic disparities among adults eligible for treatment of cholesterol.